That is the question John Bevere asks in his 2015 publication
published by Messenger International, the publication arm of Bevere ministries.
Why is good without God not good enough? Bevere seeks to understand and clarify this question.
Bevere is a new writer-speaker to me so I received this
new publication rather cautiously, although it came with high praise after my
son heard him speak in Minneapolis, I assume at Substance, a megachurch
ministry led by Peter Haas. Having repeatedly encountered this possibility
through contacts with numerous social justice groups, I was captivated with the concept that good is not good enough without God. It is a question that deserves
consideration in lieu of so much social conflict round about us, with so many
taking up social justice causes, there being so much civil unrest, racial
tension, political stress, ad infinitum.
The author began with a clear attempt at discerning both
good and evil. I found his scriptural reference in Hebrews 5:11-12, 14 (NLT)
full of suggestive thought: ”But solid food belongs to those who are of full age,
that is, those who by reason of use have their senses exercised to discern both
good and evil.” That made sense to me and seemed pretty orthodox.
It wasn’t until chapter four that he suddenly challenged
me by making a distinction in the ministry of Jesus, emphasizing a difference
between the Lordship and Jesus the Savior (48-49). Here, as elsewhere, he made
good use of the marriage relationship to clarify the walk of the Christian with
Jesus as Savior and Lord. He clarified this way (49): “I have sometimes
referred to Lisa as my ‘little gourmet chef.’ I may have called her this a
dozen or so times through our marriage, but more properly, in the past thirty
years I’ve referred to her thousands of times as my wife. Why? Because that
declares the position she holds in my life. The other title conveys a benefit I’ve
received from her being my wife.”
Continuing: “Just because Lisa cooks for me doesn’t mean
I belong to her. When I was single … she made me an amazing meal. That didn’t
give us a lasting relationship. It was the covenant I made to forsake all other
girls and give my heart solely to her as husband that solidified our marriage
relationship.” Forgiveness of sin via Jesus the Savior is not quite the same
thing as submitting to His lordship, ownership and rule in our lives.
I thought of the professed Christians I have known who
accepted the forgiveness of sins while utterly rejecting the notion that he
influence our lives in daily and public behavior. Accepting one without the
other is like my marrying my wife but reserving the right to spend one day, or
other specified time, having a fling with
other women, or with a specific other person – a marriage relationship that
does not build!
Chapter nine deals with a word with which I grew up in my
Faith tradition – “holiness.” I was also familiar with his reference (Hebrews
12:14) but the translation was very contemporary (NLT): “Work at living a holy
life, for those who are not holy will not see the Lord.” Coming from a
tradition nurtured by the Holiness Movement, I found Bevere’s writing very
different in language, but very authentic, clear, biblical and life applicable.
He described a religious experience, with which I was very familiar, but it
came in language that was very contemporary and non-traditional, yet I could
not possibly misunderstand or disagree with it.
I was forthrightly surprised at the author’s candidness
in writing. There is a common criticism abroad that suggests pastors/churches dilute
their message in order to acquire their large listening audience. On page 153 Bevere
described a devotional moment he experienced when finding himself directed to
read from Revelation 3:2, which offers this frank declaration: “Wake up! Strengthen
what little remains, for even what is left is almost dead. I find that your actions
do not meet the requirements of my God” (NLT). I confess to being more than a
little surprised at his frankness in writing; I had to admit he was simply
telling it like it is, without gloss or spin. Yes, I liked that quality in his
writing.
Bevere speaks to our contemporary society, a culture that
has a huge religious tilt, but remains a culture steeped in myopic narcissism, anti-authoritarianism,
and the lawlessness of libertarian politics. Would I recommend your reading it?
NOT if you want to stay the same as you were when you started reading; John
Maxwell does recommend the book, and I know many of my peers revere him.
Most of all: give some serious consideration to the
concept that just maybe good without God is NOT GOOD ENOUGH. This is Warner’s
World and I am
walkingwithwarner.blogspot.com
No comments:
Post a Comment